(Also, folks, sorry for missing this earlier. "AFAB" != "woman", drug tolerance is very complicated and doesn't break down cleanly along sex-assigned-at-birth lines, and just in general it's language you should be careful about using.)

Folks, please be careful with each other and with the topic of the thread. A couple notes:

• Indigenous/First Nations people are welcome to express their feelings, and those feelings aren't automatically destructive to the thread. If you think something violates the guidelines, flag it, but it's not anyone's job to tone-police angry victims of racism.
• While there certainly are commonalities between anti-Indigenous racism in Canada and anti-Black racism in the US (and other varieties of racism globally), please use care so as not to derail the thread away from the topic of anti-Indigenous racism in Canada.

Two deleted as noise.

Folks, this question has gotten flagged a couple times so i wanted to note here that i'm choosing to leave it up. It's a little chatty/research-y, but it's getting solid answers and i don't see any reason to nuke it.

Fixed typo in post title/URL; also made links clickable in this comment.

One deleted for not answering the question.

Removed two comments (one in the wrong thread, one correcting themself about the thread). Left one reply up because it also had a bunch of other info in it.

Folks, please do remember to let threads breathe rather than arguing in detail with everyone who disagrees with you. Also, anoldfriend6, check your MeMail.

Edited this comment to remove misinformation, at user's request, and removed two replies about the misinformation.

Made link clickable in this comment.

Fixed typo in post at user's request.

Added archive link to OP at user's request, and deleted a comment about the correction.

Corrected post from 14th century to 16th century.

Moved first paragraph of OP above the fold (some themes do not display titles, so some actual content must always be above the fold).

Made link clickable in this comment.

Fixed tags in OP to hopefully avoid causing annoyance to screenreader users.

The words suicide both in the content warning and in the post have been un-redacted and the content has been placed below the fold.

Folks, please pause on any further back and forth in this thread about the use of AI. There is a MeTa where you can share your opinions on how you would like these types of posts to be moderated etc. Thank you.

One deleted, seems to be posted in wrong thread.

As highlighted by a user above, please refrain from derailing this thread to discuss the issue of redacting certain words and take it to MeTa if need be.

Edited archive link in OP and deleted two comments about the correction.

Yeah, i'm not going to re-delete it, but let's not continue with the military derail, please.

One deleted; wrong thread.I misread something badly; i've restored the comment. Sorry, Paul Slade!

Also, folks, the "how people are treated" derail should either stop or go elsewhere.

Added Substack tag, and one comment deleted. Folks, Pangram is more accurate than other "AI" detectors, but it's less accurate on this kind of very formal writing than it is on other kinds of writing, because this kind of thing is overrepresented in the training corpus. Philosophers, in particular, are trained to write like this. So i don't know if the content at this link is "AI" or not. And while i personally hate "AI", the community keeps making it pretty clear that they're not thrilled about every discussion getting derailed by that question. If you must say something, please keep it to one comment; but in general, the better practice is probably to flag it to our attention and/or just not engage with the post.

One deleted; we do not need to relitigate the 2024 US election in a thread that's primarily about Canada.

Fixed broken markup in OP and deleted a comment about the correction.

One comment deleted at user's request, and a second comment deleted because the user was under the mistaken impression that this is an obit thread (Felicia Day is not dead!) Also fixed the spelling of Patton Oswalt's name in this comment.

Fixed typo in OP.

anoldfriend6: "lol women users fighting on the interwebs, rawr"

Sorry for the delay in responding to this, folks; mod coverage is light on Fridays. To be clear, this is completely unacceptable and it needs to not happen again, anoldfriend6.

One comment deleted at user's request. I've added the "AI" tag to this post so folks who want to skip this kind of thing entirely have the tools to do so. Also, folks, this comment has gotten flagged a few times for being LLM-generated, and it's definitely true that part of it is, but that part is directly quoted from the linked source, which is currently a weird gray area. hankscorpio83, you're not in trouble! But it'd be good if in the future you would use the <blockquote> tag or otherwise make clearer that you are quoting content from elsewhere, especially if that content bears the hallmarks of being generated by an LLM.

One deleted for not answering the question.

Deleted a dupurrlicate comment.

Thanks, DoT! I've edited my previous mod note to reflect correct information. (Folks have definitely been using both)

One comment deleted as noise. It's fine to think something sucks but you gotta talk about why.

Just a quick note that Jane Schoenbrun is a "she", not a "they", and it's especially important to be careful about pronouns when talking about trans folks because they get misgendered and degendered all the time. It was clearly unintentional and i'm going to leave it, but i did want to remind folks to use care! Okay, apparently i am wrong (thanks DoT) and Schoenbrun does in fact use they/them pronouns! So i'm a shining example of my own mod note here; sorry, folks. (A number of other people do use "she" in the thread, so my point stands that we need to be careful! But i am sorry for having failed to double-check the details.)

Hi, folks. Just to reiterate in an official capacity: we do in fact have policy on this. You should not use "AI" to write your posts or comments, and if you feel it's absolutely necessary to do so, you must label that content. (The relevant section of the Content Policy is here.)

Obviously we don't actually have a magic way to detect every use of "AI" for posts and comments on this site. We're on the honor system, and you can probably get away with it, at least some of the time. But choosing that path means that you are deliberately deceiving your fellow community members. It is disrespectful and gross; people are definitely going to be mad if and when they discover it, and you will fully deserve that anger.

Fixed a typo in this comment.

Several deleted. Things got very chatty and not at all answer-y in here; anoldfriend6 and okayturnip, please take the chatting to MeMail and stick to answers and/or clarifications in Ask, thanks!

Fixed link in this comment and deleted a follow-up about the error.

Fixed broken link in OP!

Fixed a typo in the OP

Duplicate comment deleted.

Fixed link in this comment.

One deleted for not answering the question. If you'd like to ask a related question, it's fine to make a new post on Ask for yourself!

Fixed broken link in this comment.

Fixed HTML in the comment above. Also, phunniemee, thank you for articulating what many of us think (speaking both as a member and as a mod); but, for the record, there's no need to name call people reading your comments, y'know. Hopefully they got the point.

One deleted. Please read the thread in full and respond only if you have an answer that addresses what OP is looking for.

Fixed typo in OP.

Fixed post to be "Show Only" so that the episodes connect up.

Fixed typo in post title/URL

One deleted for not answering the question.

Two deleted. Ideefixe, this is the second comment of yours i've seen today where you seem to be trying to bait people into a fight about racial justice issues. Knock it off; the next one gets you a timeout. (sickos, you're fine, your comment was deleted because it was a direct reply to the other one.)

Removed a comment referencing Rachel Dolezal that was absolutely going to start an irrelevant fight.

Added an archive link to the OP, in consultation with the user. Again, folks, it is not against the guidelines to link to social media, and complaining about it (especially in the first few comments) drags down threads and irritates people. If you cannot access a link for whatever reason, it's totally fine to skip a post!

Hi, folks. Many things in this thread are being flagged. One comment has been deleted for being callous; i've also added a "suicide" tag to the post. A couple notes for the conversation more broadly:

• Suicide is a very fraught topic in general, and this incident is particularly ugly for many reasons; please be very aware that conversations like this can trigger or exacerbate suicidal ideation in your fellow community members, and exercise care in making your points.
• If you are struggling with depression or suicidal ideation, we do have a page on the wiki with mental health and suicide-prevention resources. Please, do not damage yourself for the sake of this thread, and ask for help if you need it.
• The pushback on the framing of the post is very valuable, and i am letting it stand (sickos, thank you in particular for being vigilant here). I do think the point has been made and further discussion about it should probably go to MeTa.

Fixed typo in this comment.

One deleted as noise.

One deleted at user's request.

Folks, i'm not going to delete anything right now, because i'd have to leave giant holes in the thread, but conversation about people who have buttoned is absolutely off-topic here and needs to go to MeTa if you want to continue it.

One comment deleted at the user's request.

Deleted a comment that related to a now-fixed error in OP.

Added to USPolitics sidebar. Also, one comment deleted as noise.

One deleted. Please keep comments on-topic and refrain from directing comments at individual users.

Added Substack tag; edited links to be clickable in this comment and this comment.

One deleted at user's request.

One comment removed as requested.

Edited OP to add Matchmaker link, and removed a comment about the change.

OP asked us to post this comment:

Thank you all for your thoughts. I definitely am getting the sense that legal marital status holds a different level of significance to different people. Talking a bit with my partner I think we both have regrets about not being clearer in our communication. A couple points to clarify:

1. I did not probe deeper into my partner's status because I genuinely thought there was nothing to ask about - I met them on an online platform where you can set your status as single/married/separated, and they were listed as "single". Me saying "I don't really want to know" was more like, I don't like to interrogate my partners about their exes, you know?

2. I am not entirely sure where the assumption from some posters that my partner is male came from, but they do in fact use they/them pronouns.

Tagged USPolitics and added to the sidebar.

Added link to FLEEP in the post. Please carry on. Edit: also corrected a word in the post as requested by OP.

Please keep in mind that this thread is not about US matters. Please stop derailing the thread.

Made link clickable in this comment.

Made link clickable in this comment.

Your Childhood Pet Rock, please stop the back to back commenting in this thread and let others participate. Further comments will be deleted.

Duplicate comment removed.

Nothing deleted, but yeah, please do not compare people with cognitive impairments to bullshit machines. The analogy there is always going to upset people and it generates way more heat than light.

Two deleted. If you find yourself repeating the same points over and over again, it might be time to let the thread breathe, just in general.

Made a small correction: Dement -> DeMent in the title and body of the post.

Leaving the comment above as it contains sound advice, but let's try to please keep making sure that comments are addressing the question being asked. ]

A few back-to-back comments removed. okayturnip, roughly 30% of the comments in this thread are yours and several of them are back to back, please take a step back by letting other members express themselves and carry on with the conversation.

One comment removed, let's try to please keep Ask MeFi comments on topic and helpful by addressing the question being asked, instead of replying with commentary related to the subject.

Another comment removed, please keep Ask MeFi comments helpful by following the content policy and addressing the question being asked, if you have feedback regarding a mod decision you may post about it in MetaTalk instead.

One comment removed. Let's avoid name calling other fellow Mefites.

One deleted. Pseudonymous Cognomen: 90% of your comment was fine but unfortunately you cannot talk to other MeFites the way you did in the other 10%. I'm happy to remove that line and undelete, or send you the text and you can repost without it, or whatever. EDIT: The comment has been restored with the problematic bit removed, in collaboration with the user.

One deleted. I kind of hated to do it; it clearly represented real effort and an attempt to be helpful on the part of the user who made it, but it didn't really answer the question. If you're the user in question, i'm happy to send you the text if you want to try to rework it some!

anoldfriend6: "Many people on the internet assume posters on the other side of the screen are straight white men by default. Well, most people here know I’m lesbian. But…am I white, black, or Bhutanese? Who knows?" Somehow i missed this one the other day, and i'm sorry. anoldfriend6, this kind of thing isn't okay; please don't do it. either talk about your own experiences with race or don't, but this kind of "am i white or not?" thing comes across as very edgelordy and gross.

Hi, folks. Some housekeeping notes:

• i made the link in this comment clickable.
• marshmallow tester, one deleted for ableism. blind programmers exist and they tend to have an excellent understanding of both UI and UX. I left up your Flowers for Algernon reference but that too verges on ableism; please be more careful.
• okayturnip's comment was not a personal attack on cortex; it was a joke and i'm leaving it. but folks, just in general, please do be mindful that sometimes tone doesn't come across in text!

One deleted as noise. Folks, i'm not gonna leave a big hole by deleting a ton of stuff, but be advised that this thread has gone … non-optimally in a number of ways.

tara city, you have been pretty hostile about folks asking clarifying questions; it's certainly okay to decline to answer clarifying questions that folks ask, but (a) it'll probably affect the quality of the answers if folks don't feel like they have enough information, and (b) it's not okay to be rude while doing so.

Answerers, please do not be snarky with Askers even when they frustrate you; if you don't feel like you can get a clear enough picture of the problem to answer, it's okay to just not answer; especially in Ask, the optimal behavior here is to flag it and move on.